Sorry for the confusion. Email input field does not need a custom validation to filter our email addresses. It will only accept valid email format as a default.
Best,
Lotus Project
•
Nov 10, 2025
With default validations I get an error as well! The issue is that the email field should be disabled in this case and the validation should not hit anyway, no mater if they are custom or default. It’s clear now?
Lotus Project
•
Nov 6, 2025
I ment why does the field validation gets triggered even though the block should be disabled from the rules applies by choosing NO.
Archie
Team•
Nov 11, 2025
Hi There,
Sorry but can you please reach out to our live chat support and share the form URL so we can understand the issue better?
Thanks for the update — and thank you for sharing the custom validation you added.
Here’s what’s happening:
The validation is still triggering because the field has a custom validation rule applied, and even if the block is conditionally disabled, that custom rule will still run in the background. This is why the email field shows an error when the rule is active, even though the block should be hidden or disabled based on the conditions.
To fix this, please remove the custom regex validation you added:
The email field already has built-in email validation, so you don’t need to set a custom rule for it. Once the custom rule is removed, the conditional logic will work as expected and the field won’t trigger validation when disabled.
If it still behaves oddly after removing the custom rule, please let me know — I’m here to help and happy to check further!
Lotus Project
•
Nov 18, 2025
Hi @Archie, thank you for the update. I’ve tested again after removing all the rules from validation, but I still get and error if the field is filled with the wrong values, even though it should be disabled.
Archie
Team•
Nov 25, 2025
Sorry for the inconvenience here. Let me check this further.
Log in to comment and vote
Comments9
Archie
Nov 10, 2025
Hi Lotus,
Sorry for the confusion. Email input field does not need a custom validation to filter our email addresses. It will only accept valid email format as a default.
Best,
Lotus Project
Nov 10, 2025
With default validations I get an error as well!
The issue is that the email field should be disabled in this case and the validation should not hit anyway, no mater if they are custom or default.
It’s clear now?
Lotus Project
Nov 6, 2025
I ment why does the field validation gets triggered even though the block should be disabled from the rules applies by choosing NO.
Archie
Nov 11, 2025
Hi There,
Sorry but can you please reach out to our live chat support and share the form URL so we can understand the issue better?
Lotus Project
Nov 11, 2025
Hi Archie, this is the url of the form:
https://opnform.com/forms/studiu-de-caz-management-clinica-medicala-ahfzks.
Thank you!
Lotus Project
Nov 17, 2025
Hi @Archie, so what do I do with this?
Archie
Nov 18, 2025
Thanks for the update — and thank you for sharing the custom validation you added.
Here’s what’s happening:
The validation is still triggering because the field has a custom validation rule applied, and even if the block is conditionally disabled, that custom rule will still run in the background. This is why the email field shows an error when the rule is active, even though the block should be hidden or disabled based on the conditions.
To fix this, please remove the custom regex validation you added:
^[a-zA-Z0-9]([._-]?[a-zA-Z0-9]+)*@[a-zA-Z0-9-]+\.[a-zA-Z]{2,}$The email field already has built-in email validation, so you don’t need to set a custom rule for it. Once the custom rule is removed, the conditional logic will work as expected and the field won’t trigger validation when disabled.
If it still behaves oddly after removing the custom rule, please let me know — I’m here to help and happy to check further!
Lotus Project
Nov 18, 2025
Hi @Archie, thank you for the update.
I’ve tested again after removing all the rules from validation, but I still get and error if the field is filled with the wrong values, even though it should be disabled.
Archie
Nov 25, 2025
Sorry for the inconvenience here. Let me check this further.